🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.