🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear response by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has in the past noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."