🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their future often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near the famous falls where they are housed stated it would consider to put them down unless the government funds the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker discovered personally.

Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the details and quirks in their characters. She formed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing personalities.

“Eve chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I understand bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her time at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility attributes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … receive far better health care and constant supervision than any individual in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park believed information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to put down even a one beluga would require “significant personnel”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for demands for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that belugas belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience approve an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a more general misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be highly debated. The planned facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Proponents remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the short term.

An official, leader of the plan, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|